Abstract
The paper aims to move the debate between Alston and critics of Perceiving God forward by asking if Alston's book establishes a case for a realist interpretation of Christian mystical perception. It is argued that critical comments on Alston's paper in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research by Richard Gale point, when reinterpreted, to a crucial disparity between mystical perception and sense perception. A realist interpretation of the former is not prima facie warranted but a realist interpretation of the latter. Alston confuses the question of whether mystical perception yields true outputs with the question of its realist status.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 74 - 88 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | PHILO: A JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY |
Volume | 3 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - 2000 |