Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Quality of stepped-wedge trial reporting can be reliably assessed using an updated CONSORT: crowd-sourcing systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.- Sort by
- Weight
- Alphabetically
Quality of stepped-wedge trial reporting can be reliably assessed using an updated CONSORT: crowd-sourcing systematic review
The SW-CRT Review Group, Karla Hemming*, Kelly Carroll, Jennifer Thompson, Andrew Forbes, Monica Taljaard, Susan J. Dutton, Vichithranie Madurasinghe, Katy Morgan, Beth Stuart, Katherine Fielding, Victoria Cornelius, Elizabeth L. Turner, Richard Hooper, Bruno Giraudeau, Paul T. Seed, Alecia Nickless, Michael Grayling, Melanie Prague, Sally Kerry
*Corresponding author for this work
- Birmingham Business School
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy
- Monash University
- University of Ottawa
- Queen Mary University of London
- University Southampton Faculty of Medicine and NIHR Southampton Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit
- Imperial College London
- Duke University
- University of Tours
- MRC Medical Research Council
- Inria French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation
- Oxford Brookes University
- INSERM
- Karakter Child and Adolescent Psychiatry University Centre
- Utrecht University
- Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit
- University of Plymouth
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- York Trials Unit, York University, York, UK.
- University of Kent
- NHS Blood and Transplant
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- Institute of Cancer Research
- University of Sheffield
- NICTU
- University of Leicester
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review
9
Citations
(Scopus)
146
Downloads
(Pure)