TY - JOUR
T1 - Trauma and social pathways to psychosis, and where the two paths meet
AU - Heriot-Maitland, Charles
AU - Wykes, Til
AU - Peters, Emmanuelle
N1 - Funding Information:
CH-M acknowledges the Department of Psychology, IoPPN, King's College London, who hosted his PhD research program for which this review was written. TW acknowledges the support of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Maudsley Biomedical Research Center at South London and Maudsley NHS Trust and King's College London and her NIHR Senior Investigator Award.
Funding Information:
CH-M acknowledges the Department of Psychology, IoPPN, King’s College London, who hosted his PhD research program for which this review was written. TW acknowledges the support of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Maudsley Biomedical Research Center at South London and Maudsley NHS Trust and King’s College London and her NIHR Senior Investigator Award.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by a Medical Research Council Fellowship (CH-M, grant number MR/L01677X/1).
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Heriot-Maitland, Wykes and Peters.
PY - 2022/1/10
Y1 - 2022/1/10
N2 - The pathways from trauma—via dissociation—to psychosis have been thoroughly tested and evidenced, but what has received less attention has been the social pathways—via dissociation—to psychosis. Often social factors are more commonly linked to other influences, e.g., to appraisals and the creation of negative schema in cognitive models, or to unsupportive caregiving experiences where there is high “expressed emotion.” However, evidence is now emerging that negative social rank experiences, such as being excluded or shamed, may themselves have dissociative properties, which poses intriguing questions as to how trauma pathways and social pathways might interact. This article reviews the state of knowledge in trauma and social pathways to psychosis and then considers the potential mechanisms and the relationships between them, specifically (i) dissociation, (ii) attachment, and (iii) social rank. Recommendations are suggested for future modeling and testing of three-way interactions (dissociation × attachment × social rank) in the pathway from trauma to psychosis.
AB - The pathways from trauma—via dissociation—to psychosis have been thoroughly tested and evidenced, but what has received less attention has been the social pathways—via dissociation—to psychosis. Often social factors are more commonly linked to other influences, e.g., to appraisals and the creation of negative schema in cognitive models, or to unsupportive caregiving experiences where there is high “expressed emotion.” However, evidence is now emerging that negative social rank experiences, such as being excluded or shamed, may themselves have dissociative properties, which poses intriguing questions as to how trauma pathways and social pathways might interact. This article reviews the state of knowledge in trauma and social pathways to psychosis and then considers the potential mechanisms and the relationships between them, specifically (i) dissociation, (ii) attachment, and (iii) social rank. Recommendations are suggested for future modeling and testing of three-way interactions (dissociation × attachment × social rank) in the pathway from trauma to psychosis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124010742&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.804971
DO - 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.804971
M3 - Article
SN - 1664-0640
VL - 12
JO - Frontiers in Psychiatry
JF - Frontiers in Psychiatry
M1 - 804971
ER -