A crisis of recognition: gender, race, and the struggle to be seen in pre-modernity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

It used to be said that shame culture waned in early modernity, but there is a growing body of historiography on the vital role that recognition and the opinion of others continued to play. Honour mattered; for some it was the mark and the maker of your true self. While philosophers like Hobbes, Locke, Mandeville, Hume, Smith, and Rousseau disagreed in their evaluations of the phenomenon, they were united in thinking that the great engine of recognition whirred like furious clockwork through human society. When one listens to voices from the margins of power, however, to formerly enslaved black women and men, and white women, one hears a different story – that the machine is broken. I argue that, albeit from incomparable positions, they articulate a theory of misrecognition in the face of systematic power. Sensitive to the entanglements of epistemology and naturalised inequality, they offer a politics of vision that deconstructs the punitive lenses of gender and race which render people invisible and misunderstood, and in so doing they try to write themselves into view. They offer an account of the mysterious intractability of hegemonic ways of seeing that poses a challenge to both the putatively laissez-faire economy of recognition of their enlightened contemporaries, and to the emancipatory teleology of modern recognition theorists.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)319-351
Number of pages33
JournalBritish Journal for the History of Philosophy
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Mar 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A crisis of recognition: gender, race, and the struggle to be seen in pre-modernity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this