Abstract
Objective
Psychosocial factors are related to pain and sex-related outcomes in provoked Vulvodynia and possibly, in mixed and spontaneous Vulvodynia. However, a broader behavioural framework, such as the psychological flexibility model, has received limited attention in this context. Recently, additional psychosocial variables have also emerged that appear relevant to Vulvodynia, including perceived injustice, body-exposure anxiety during intercourse, and unmitigated sexual communion. The present study applied network analysis to explore relations between psychological flexibility, newly emerging psychosocial variables relevant to Vulvodynia, and their associations with Vulvodynia outcomes. The study also explored potential differences across Vulvodynia subtypes.
Design
An online cross-sectional study of 349 participants with Vulvodynia (112 provoked, 237 spontaneous/mixed) was carried out.
Methods
Participants completed self-report questionnaires, including pain and sexual outcomes, depression, facets of psychological flexibility, body-exposure anxiety during intercourse, unmitigated sexual communion, and perceived injustice. Networks were computed for the total sample and provoked and mixed/spontaneous Vulvodynia subsamples.
Results
Perceived injustice, pain-acceptance, and depression were “central” factors, among the included variables, in all models. Psychological flexibility processes were relevant for all networks. Depression was more central in the network for mixed/spontaneous Vulvodynia; body-exposure anxiety during intercourse was most central for the provoked subtype.
Conclusions
Among included variables, perceived injustice, pain-acceptance, depression, and psychological flexibility appear to be important in Vulvodynia. As different factors are significant across subtypes, tailored treatment approaches are suggested.
Psychosocial factors are related to pain and sex-related outcomes in provoked Vulvodynia and possibly, in mixed and spontaneous Vulvodynia. However, a broader behavioural framework, such as the psychological flexibility model, has received limited attention in this context. Recently, additional psychosocial variables have also emerged that appear relevant to Vulvodynia, including perceived injustice, body-exposure anxiety during intercourse, and unmitigated sexual communion. The present study applied network analysis to explore relations between psychological flexibility, newly emerging psychosocial variables relevant to Vulvodynia, and their associations with Vulvodynia outcomes. The study also explored potential differences across Vulvodynia subtypes.
Design
An online cross-sectional study of 349 participants with Vulvodynia (112 provoked, 237 spontaneous/mixed) was carried out.
Methods
Participants completed self-report questionnaires, including pain and sexual outcomes, depression, facets of psychological flexibility, body-exposure anxiety during intercourse, unmitigated sexual communion, and perceived injustice. Networks were computed for the total sample and provoked and mixed/spontaneous Vulvodynia subsamples.
Results
Perceived injustice, pain-acceptance, and depression were “central” factors, among the included variables, in all models. Psychological flexibility processes were relevant for all networks. Depression was more central in the network for mixed/spontaneous Vulvodynia; body-exposure anxiety during intercourse was most central for the provoked subtype.
Conclusions
Among included variables, perceived injustice, pain-acceptance, depression, and psychological flexibility appear to be important in Vulvodynia. As different factors are significant across subtypes, tailored treatment approaches are suggested.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Pain Medicine |
| Publication status | Published - 28 Aug 2021 |