An update and review of simulation in urological training

James Brewin*, Kamran Ahmed, Ben Challacombe

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Simulation, if appropriately integrated into surgical training, may provide a time efficient, cost effective and safe method of training. The use of simulation in urology training is supported by a growing evidence base for its use, leading many authors to call for it to be integrated into the curriculum. There is growing evidence for the utilisation of part task (technical skills) simulators to shorten the learning curve in an environment that does not compromise patient safety. There is also evidence that non-technical skills affect patient outcomes in the operating room and that high fidelity team based simulation training can improve non-technical skills and surgical team performance. This evidence has strengthened the argument of surgical educators who feel that simulation should be formally incorporated into the urology training curriculum to develop both technical and non-technical skills with the aim of optimising performance and patient safety.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-108
Number of pages6
JournalInternational journal of surgery (London, England)
Volume12
Issue number2
Early online date4 Dec 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014

Keywords

  • Computer Simulation
  • Computer-Assisted Instruction/methods
  • Education, Medical, Continuing/methods
  • Humans
  • Urologic Surgical Procedures/education
  • Urology/education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An update and review of simulation in urological training'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this