TY - JOUR
T1 - Anarchy, Groups, and Conflict
T2 - An Experiment on the Emergence of Protective Associations
AU - Smith, Adam
AU - Skarbek, David
AU - Wilson, Bart
PY - 2012/2
Y1 - 2012/2
N2 - In this article, we investigate the implications of the philosophical considerations presented in Nozick’s Anarchy, State, and Utopia, by examining group formation in a laboratory setting where subjects engage in both cooperative and conflictual interactions. We endow participants with a commodity used to generate earnings, plunder others, or protect against plunder. In our primary treatment, we allow participants to form groups to pool their resources. We conduct a baseline comparison treatment that does not allow group formation. We find that allowing subjects to organize themselves into groups does not lead to more cooperation and may in fact exacerbate tendencies towards conflict.
AB - In this article, we investigate the implications of the philosophical considerations presented in Nozick’s Anarchy, State, and Utopia, by examining group formation in a laboratory setting where subjects engage in both cooperative and conflictual interactions. We endow participants with a commodity used to generate earnings, plunder others, or protect against plunder. In our primary treatment, we allow participants to form groups to pool their resources. We conduct a baseline comparison treatment that does not allow group formation. We find that allowing subjects to organize themselves into groups does not lead to more cooperation and may in fact exacerbate tendencies towards conflict.
U2 - 10.1007/s00355-011-0534-5
DO - 10.1007/s00355-011-0534-5
M3 - Article
SN - 0176-1714
VL - 38
SP - 325
EP - 353
JO - SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE
JF - SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE
IS - 2
ER -