Annual Research Review: Threats to the validity of child psychiatry and psychology

Michael Rutter*, Andrew Pickles

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Citations (Scopus)
566 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Suggestions have been made that many claims concern false-positive findings in the field of child psychology and psychiatry. Methods: The literature was searched for concepts and findings on the validity of child psychiatry and psychology. Findings: Substantial progress has been made in some, but not all, areas and considerable challenges remain in all. Conclusions: The two major threats to validity concern the inability to examine brain tissues in life and the evidence that there is a high overlap among disorders. We emphasize the need to follow published guidelines on preplanned analyses and we note the dangers associated with unregulated flexibility in data analysis. We note the very important clinical and developmental findings that have been ignored, perhaps partly because of an excessive focus on technologies. Nevertheless, we are positive about both the accomplishments and the ways in which challenges are being met.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)398–416
JournalJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Volume57
Issue number3
Early online date19 Sept 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Mar 2016

Keywords

  • Bioinformatics
  • Biomarkers
  • Brain imaging
  • Classification
  • Diagnosis
  • Epigenetics
  • Genetics
  • Neural networks

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Annual Research Review: Threats to the validity of child psychiatry and psychology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this