Antioxidants versus corticosteroids in the treatment of severe alcoholic hepatitis - A randomised clinical trial

M Phillips, H Curtis, B Portmann, N Donaldson, A Bomford, J O'Grady

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

173 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Aims: Severe alcoholic hepatitis is associated with high morbidity and short-term mortality. Corticosteroids are the only widely used therapy but established contraindications to treatment or the risk of serious side-effects limit their use. The perceived need for alternative treatments together with the theoretical benefits of antioxidant therapy triggered the design of a randomised clinical trial comparing these treatment modalities. Methods: One hundred and one patients were randomized into a clinical trial of corticosteroids or a novel antioxidant cocktail with a primary endpoint of 30-day mortality. Results: At 30 days there were 16 deaths (30%) in the corticosteroid treated group compared with 22 deaths (46%) in the antioxidant treated group (P=0.05). The odds of dying by 30 days were 2.4 greater for patients on antioxidants (95% confidence interval 1.0-5.6). A diagnosis of sepsis was made more frequently in the AO group (P=0.05), although microbiologically proven episodes of infection occurred more often in the CS group (P <0.01). The survival advantage for corticosteroid treated patients was lost at 1 year of follow-up (P=0.43). Conclusions: This study has shown that corticosteroids in the form of prednisolone 30 mg daily are superior to a broad antioxidant cocktail in the treatment of severe alcoholic hepatitis. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of the European Association for the Study of the Liver
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)784 - 790
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Hepatology
Volume44
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2006

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Antioxidants versus corticosteroids in the treatment of severe alcoholic hepatitis - A randomised clinical trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this