Are chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome valid clinical entities across countries and health-care settings?

Ian Hickie, Tracey Davenport, Suzanne D Vernon, Rosane Nisenbaum, William C Reeves, Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic, Andrew Lloyd, International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The validity of the diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome and related chronic fatigue states remains controversial, particularly in psychiatry. This project utilized international epidemiological and clinical research data to test construct validity across diagnostic categories, health-care settings and countries. Relevant demographic, symptom and diagnostic data were obtained from 33 studies in 21 countries. The subjects had fatigue lasting 1-6 months (prolonged fatigue), or >6 months (chronic fatigue), or met diagnostic criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25-35
Number of pages11
JournalThe Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome valid clinical entities across countries and health-care settings?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this