Assessment of the direct effects of DDAH I on tumour angiogenesis in vivo

Efthymia Papaevangelou, Jessica K.R Boult, Guy S Whitley, Simon P. Robinson, Franklyn A. Howe

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    7 Citations (Scopus)
    128 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Nitric oxide (NO) has been strongly implicated in glioma progression and angiogenesis. The endogenous inhibitors of NO synthesis, asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and N-monomethyl-l-arginine (l-NMMA), are metabolized by dimethyl-arginine dimethylaminohydrolase (DDAH), and hence, DDAH is an intracellular factor that regulates NO. However, DDAH may also have an NO-independent action. We aimed to investigate whether DDAH I has any direct role in tumour vascular development and growth independent of its NO-mediated effects, in order to establish the future potential of DDAH inhibition as an anti-angiogenic treatment strategy. A clone of rat C6 glioma cells deficient in NO production expressing a pTet Off regulatable element was identified and engineered to overexpress DDAH I in the absence of doxycycline. Xenografts derived from these cells were propagated in the presence or absence of doxycycline and susceptibility magnetic resonance imaging used to assess functional vasculature in vivo. Pathological correlates of tumour vascular density, maturation and function were also sought. In the absence of doxycycline, tumours exhibited high DDAH I expression and activity, which was suppressed in its presence. However, overexpression of DDAH I had no measurable effect on tumour growth, vessel density, function or maturation. These data suggest that in C6 gliomas DDAH has no NO-independent effects on tumour growth and angiogenesis, and that the therapeutic potential of targeting DDAH in gliomas should only be considered in the context of NO regulation.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalANGIOGENESIS
    Early online date2 May 2018
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of the direct effects of DDAH I on tumour angiogenesis in vivo'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this