TY - JOUR
T1 - Automated detection of cardiac rest period for trigger delay calculation for image-based navigator coronary magnetic resonance angiography
AU - Wood, Gregory
AU - Pedersen, Alexandra Uglebjerg
AU - Kunze, Karl P
AU - Neji, Radhouene
AU - Hajhosseiny, Reza
AU - Wetzl, Jens
AU - Yoon, Seung Su
AU - Schmidt, Michaela
AU - Nørgaard, Bjarne Linde
AU - Prieto, Claudia
AU - Botnar, René M
AU - Kim, Won Yong
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the following grants: Health Research Fund of Central Denmark Region (A1000), health insurance “danmark” (2020-0106) and the Karen Elise Jensen Foundation; the British Heart Foundation (RG/20/1/34802 and FS/CRTF/20/24011); and the Millennium Institute for Intelligent Healthcare Engineering iHEALTH (ICN2021_004) and Fondecyt 1210638.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
PY - 2023/10/2
Y1 - 2023/10/2
N2 - Background: Coronary magnetic resonance angiography (coronary MRA) is increasingly being considered as a clinically viable method to investigate coronary artery disease (CAD). Accurate determination of the trigger delay to place the acquisition window within the quiescent part of the cardiac cycle is critical for coronary MRA in order to reduce cardiac motion. This is currently reliant on operator-led decision making, which can negatively affect consistency of scan acquisition. Recently developed deep learning (DL) derived software may overcome these issues by automation of cardiac rest period detection. Methods: Thirty individuals (female, n = 10) were investigated using a 0.9 mm isotropic image-navigator (iNAV)-based motion-corrected coronary MRA sequence. Each individual was scanned three times utilising different strategies for determination of the optimal trigger delay: (1) the DL software, (2) an experienced operator decision, and (3) a previously utilised formula for determining the trigger delay. Methodologies were compared using custom-made analysis software to assess visible coronary vessel length and coronary vessel sharpness for the entire vessel length and the first 4 cm of each vessel. Results: There was no difference in image quality between any of the methodologies for determination of the optimal trigger delay, as assessed by visible coronary vessel length, coronary vessel sharpness for each entire vessel and vessel sharpness for the first 4 cm of the left mainstem, left anterior descending or right coronary arteries. However, vessel length of the left circumflex was slightly greater using the formula method. The time taken to calculate the trigger delay was significantly lower for the DL-method as compared to the operator-led approach (106 ± 38.0 s vs 168 ± 39.2 s, p < 0.01, 95% CI of difference 25.5–98.1 s). Conclusions: Deep learning-derived automated software can effectively and efficiently determine the optimal trigger delay for acquisition of coronary MRA and thus may simplify workflow and improve reproducibility.
AB - Background: Coronary magnetic resonance angiography (coronary MRA) is increasingly being considered as a clinically viable method to investigate coronary artery disease (CAD). Accurate determination of the trigger delay to place the acquisition window within the quiescent part of the cardiac cycle is critical for coronary MRA in order to reduce cardiac motion. This is currently reliant on operator-led decision making, which can negatively affect consistency of scan acquisition. Recently developed deep learning (DL) derived software may overcome these issues by automation of cardiac rest period detection. Methods: Thirty individuals (female, n = 10) were investigated using a 0.9 mm isotropic image-navigator (iNAV)-based motion-corrected coronary MRA sequence. Each individual was scanned three times utilising different strategies for determination of the optimal trigger delay: (1) the DL software, (2) an experienced operator decision, and (3) a previously utilised formula for determining the trigger delay. Methodologies were compared using custom-made analysis software to assess visible coronary vessel length and coronary vessel sharpness for the entire vessel length and the first 4 cm of each vessel. Results: There was no difference in image quality between any of the methodologies for determination of the optimal trigger delay, as assessed by visible coronary vessel length, coronary vessel sharpness for each entire vessel and vessel sharpness for the first 4 cm of the left mainstem, left anterior descending or right coronary arteries. However, vessel length of the left circumflex was slightly greater using the formula method. The time taken to calculate the trigger delay was significantly lower for the DL-method as compared to the operator-led approach (106 ± 38.0 s vs 168 ± 39.2 s, p < 0.01, 95% CI of difference 25.5–98.1 s). Conclusions: Deep learning-derived automated software can effectively and efficiently determine the optimal trigger delay for acquisition of coronary MRA and thus may simplify workflow and improve reproducibility.
KW - Humans
KW - Female
KW - Magnetic Resonance Angiography/methods
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Predictive Value of Tests
KW - Heart
KW - Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging
KW - Coronary Angiography/methods
KW - Imaging, Three-Dimensional
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85173003322&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12968-023-00962-9
DO - 10.1186/s12968-023-00962-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 37779192
SN - 1097-6647
VL - 25
SP - 52
JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
IS - 1
M1 - 52
ER -