Can GM-technologies help the poor? The impact of Bt cotton in Makhathini Flats, KwaZulu-Natal

C Thirtle, L Beyers, Y Ismael, J Piesse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

151 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The results of a two-year survey of smallholders in Makhathini Flats, KwaZulu-Natal show that farmers who adopted Bt cotton in 1999-2000 benefited according to all the measures used. Higher yields and lower chemical costs outweighed higher seed costs, giving higher gross margins. These measures showed negative benefits in 1998-99, which conflicts with continued adoption, but stochastic efficiency frontier estimation, which takes account of the labor saved, showed that adopters averaged 88% efficiency, as compared with 66% for the nonadopters. In 1999-2000, when late rains lowered yields, the gap widened to 74% for adopters and 48% for nonadopters. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)717 - 732
Number of pages16
JournalWORLD DEVELOPMENT
Volume31
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2003

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can GM-technologies help the poor? The impact of Bt cotton in Makhathini Flats, KwaZulu-Natal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this