Cloak-and-dagger Organization Research: Benefits, Costs & Ethics of Covert Participant Observation

Thomas J. Roulet, Michael J. Gill, Sebastien Stenger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

261 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Covert participant observation has often been discarded as a research method in the social sciences on the grounds that deceiving research subjects is unethical. This article reviews the benefits and costs of the method to argue that the ethicality of covert observation is more ambiguous. It posits that all observational studies sit along a continuum of consent, with few research projects being either fully overt or fully covert. Furthermore, this article demonstrates that the study of socially important topics such as deviance, misconduct or the treatment of minorities is often only possible through substantially covert participant observation.
Original languageEnglish
JournalACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT BEST PAPER PROCEEDINGS
Volume2016
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 20 Apr 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cloak-and-dagger Organization Research: Benefits, Costs & Ethics of Covert Participant Observation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this