Clozapine haematological monitoring for neutropenia: a global perspective

Ebenezer Oloyede*, Graham Blackman, Eromona Whiskey, Christian Bachmann, Olubanke Dzahini, Sukhi Shergill, David Taylor, Philip McGuire, James MacCabe

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims. Clozapine is licensed for treatment-resistant psychosis and remains underutilised. This may berelated to the stringent haematological monitoring requirements that are mandatory in most countries. We aimed to compare guidelines internationally and develop a novel Stringency Index. We hypothesised that the most stringent countries would have increased healthcare costs and reduced prescription rates. Method. We conducted a literature review and survey of guidelines internationally. Guideline identification involved a literature review and consultation with clinical academics. We focused on the haematological monitoring parameters, frequency and thresholds for discontinuation and rechallenge after suspected clozapine-induced neutropenia. In addition, indicators reflecting monitoring guideline stringency were scored and visualised using a choropleth map. We developed a Stringency Index with an international panel of clozapine experts, through a modified-Delphi-survey. The Stringency Index was compared to health expenditure per-capita and clozapine prescription per 100 000 persons. Results. One hundred twocountries were included, from Europe (n = 35), Asia (n = 24), Africa (n = 20), South America (n = 11), North America (n = 7) and Oceania and Australia (n = 5). Guidelines differed in frequency of haematological monitoring and discontinuation thresholds. Overall, 5% of included countries had explicit guidelines for clozapine-rechallenge and 40% explicitly prohibited clozapine-rechallenge. Furthermore, 7% of included countries had modified discontinuation thresholds for benign ethnic neutropenia. None of the guidelines specified how long haematological monitoring should continue. The most stringent guidelines were in Europe, and the least stringent were in Africa and South America. There was a positive association (r = 0.43, p < 0.001) between a country’s Stringency Index and healthcare expenditure per capita. Conclusions. Recommendations on how haematological function should be monitored in patients treated with clozapine vary considerably between countries. It would be useful to standardise guidelines on haematological monitoring worldwide.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere83
JournalEpidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
Volume31
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Nov 2022

Keywords

  • Adverse drug reaction
  • national guidelines
  • safety
  • stringency index
  • tolerability
  • treatment discontinuation
  • treatment-resistant schizophrenia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clozapine haematological monitoring for neutropenia: a global perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this