Conspiracy Theories, Right-Wing Populism and Foreign Policy: The Case of the Alternative for Germany

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)
147 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article analyses the relationship between conspiracy theories, populism and foreign policy by shedding light on the affective force of conspiracy theories in mobilising ‘the people’. Drawing on Lacanian psychoanalysis, it conceptualises conspiracy theories as fantasies that promise to satisfy subjects’ desire for a complete identity by accusing ‘hidden’ forces of blocking this perceived-to-be-lost but ultimately unattainable sense of ontological wholeness. The article argues that conspiracy theories allow populists to appeal to voters through emotive narratives which offer a dualistic outlook on global politics and (1) blame the conspirators for such feelings of lack, (2) transgress the conventions of the mainstream discourse by appealing to the obscene, and (3) valorise the populist actor for uncovering the plot against popular sovereignty and thereby promising to make ‘the people’ whole again. While conspiracy theories have been studied in other disciplines, International Relations scholarship has paid very little attention to them and, if at all, discussed their role in the context of the United States. This article illustrates its arguments with the case of the right-wing populist party Alternative for Germany and examines the role of conspiracy theories and foreign policy in its attempt to stage itself as ‘true’ representative of the German people.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal Of International Relations And Development
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 22 May 2021

Keywords

  • Right-wing Populism
  • Foreign Policy
  • Conspiracy theories
  • Lacanian Psychoanalysis
  • identity
  • Alternative for Germany (AfD)
  • Affect

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conspiracy Theories, Right-Wing Populism and Foreign Policy: The Case of the Alternative for Germany'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this