Continental drift? Do European clinical genetic testing laboratories have a patent problem?

Johnathon Liddicoat, Kathleen Liddell, Arlie H McCarthy, Stuart Hogarth, Mateo Aboy, Dianne Nicol, Simon Patton, Michael M Hopkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent US Supreme Court decisions have invalidated patent claims on isolated genomic DNA, and testing methods that applied medical correlations using conventional techniques. As a consequence, US genetic testing laboratories have a relatively low risk of infringing patents on naturally occurring DNA or methods for detecting genomic variants. In Europe, however, such claims remain patentable, and European laboratories risk infringing them. We report the results from a survey that collected data on the impact of patents on European genetic testing laboratories. The results indicate that the proportion of European laboratories that have refrained from providing associated testing services owing to patent protection has increased over the last decade (up from 7% in 2008 to 15% in 2017), and that the non-profit sector was particularly strongly affected (up from 4% in 2008 to 14% in 2017). We renew calls for more readily available legal support to help public sector laboratories deal with patent issues, but we do not recommend aligning European law with US law at present. Watchful monitoring is also recommended to ensure that patents do not become a greater hindrance for clinical genetic testing laboratories.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)997-1007
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG
Volume27
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2019

Keywords

  • Europe
  • Genetic Testing/legislation & jurisprudence
  • Humans
  • Patents as Topic
  • Supreme Court Decisions
  • United States

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Continental drift? Do European clinical genetic testing laboratories have a patent problem?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this