TY - JOUR
T1 - Correspondence, scale and the Linguistic Survey of India's colonial geographies of language, 1896–1928
AU - Jagessar, Philip
N1 - Funding Information:
I am enormously grateful for the comments received from the reviewers, which have markedly improved the paper. I am also thankful for the support of the editors throughout the process. The research behind this paper was funded by a doctoral scholarship from the University of Nottingham’s School of Geography.
Funding Information:
I am enormously grateful for the comments received from the reviewers, which have markedly improved the paper. I am also thankful for the support of the editors throughout the process. The research behind this paper was funded by a doctoral scholarship from the University of Nottingham's School of Geography.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - This paper examines the Linguistic Survey of India (LSI), a monumental exercise supervised by George Grierson to survey and classify the languages of colonial India. It considers why the LSI developed into an atypical scheme that corresponded with a multiethnic and multinational network of officials and scholars to survey India's languages. It makes the case that the networked practice of surveying was reciprocated at different scales, from localised linguistic surveys in districts and princely states to gather information and specimens, to a loosely governed transnational exercise involving Indians and Europeans to edit, review and publish results. The paper argues that the LSI's scalar geographies were negotiated by Grierson and, more importantly, his assistant Gauri Kant Roy and demonstrates that scale, as an analytic or process, was not an abstraction or predetermined for those entangled in the LSI's survey of India's languages.
AB - This paper examines the Linguistic Survey of India (LSI), a monumental exercise supervised by George Grierson to survey and classify the languages of colonial India. It considers why the LSI developed into an atypical scheme that corresponded with a multiethnic and multinational network of officials and scholars to survey India's languages. It makes the case that the networked practice of surveying was reciprocated at different scales, from localised linguistic surveys in districts and princely states to gather information and specimens, to a loosely governed transnational exercise involving Indians and Europeans to edit, review and publish results. The paper argues that the LSI's scalar geographies were negotiated by Grierson and, more importantly, his assistant Gauri Kant Roy and demonstrates that scale, as an analytic or process, was not an abstraction or predetermined for those entangled in the LSI's survey of India's languages.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85188751816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhg.2024.02.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jhg.2024.02.004
M3 - Article
SN - 0305-7488
VL - 84
SP - 1
EP - 13
JO - JOURNAL OF HISTORICAL GEOGRAPHY
JF - JOURNAL OF HISTORICAL GEOGRAPHY
ER -