Abstract
The American Knee Society score (AKSS) and the Oxford Knee score (OKS) are validated outcome measures for evaluation of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). We investigated whether patient self-assessment using the OKS offers a viable alternative to clinical review using the AKSS. Preoperative, 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year postoperative OKS and AKSS were reviewed from TKA patients. The scores were analyzed using the Pearson correlation. There was good correlation of OKS and AKSS at 2 years. This implies that patient self-assessment is a viable screening tool to identify which patients require clinical review, at 2 years, after TKA. However, the moderate correlation at 5 and 10 years indicates that clinical evaluation remains necessary at these time points.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 652-656 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Journal of Arthroplasty |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2009 |
Keywords
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Great Britain
- Health Surveys
- Humans
- Knee Joint
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
- Patient Satisfaction
- Range of Motion, Articular
- Sensitivity and Specificity
- Treatment Outcome
- United States