Abstract
Some celebrated philosophical logicians (including Jan Lukasiewicz and Athur Prior) have defended the (arguably) Aristotelian view that (necessarily) only what is inevitable (at a time) is true (at that time). I argue that champions of that view are not in a position to offer a good account of the compossibility or otherwise of p with its evitability and its untruth.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 210-228 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Analytic Philosophy |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 15 Aug 2015 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2015 |