Abstract
A major development in global marketing research is the evolution of global consumer culture theory and the notion that global consumer culture positioning (GCCP) strategies can be effective across markets. This study compares the content of a large sample of U.S. versus Japanese television advertising and looks at several executional variables (timing and counting variables) used in prior studies to explore whether global brands use more similar executions across the United States and Japan in comparison with local brands. Results indicate fewer differences for global brands on these dimensions. This pattern of results appears to be consistent with the notion that the use of GCCP strategies aimed at responding to the trend toward global consumer culture have taken hold and that for global brands it is more possible to standardize executions, in addition to strategy, than was the case in the past. However, results suggest that the amount of time that visuals are on screen is more difficult to standardize than other elements of the ad, and that ads for services show somewhat more similarities than ads for physical products. Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 276-288 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING |
Volume | 44 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 13 Jan 2015 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Keywords
- International marketing strategy
- Global branding
- Japan
- Advertising as Topic
- Comparative research
- Culture
- Cross-cultural study