TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of peri-operative chemotherapy regimen on survival in the treatment of locally advanced oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma – A comparison of the FLOT and ‘MAGIC’ regimens
AU - Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-gastric Research Group including the following co-authors
AU - Moore, Jonathan L.
AU - Kumar, Sacheen
AU - Santaolalla, Aida
AU - Patel, Pranav H.
AU - Kapiris, Matthaios
AU - Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
AU - Maisey, Nick
AU - Hill, Mark
AU - Lagergren, Jesper
AU - Gossage, James A.
AU - Kelly, Mark
AU - Chaudry, Asif
AU - Allum, William H.
AU - Baker, Cara R.
AU - Cunningham, David
AU - Davies, Andrew R.
AU - Jacques, A.
AU - Griffin, N.
AU - Goh, V.
AU - Ngan, S.
AU - Owczarczyk, K.
AU - Lumsden, A.
AU - Qureshi, A.
AU - Deere, H.
AU - Green, M.
AU - Chang, F.
AU - Mahadeva, U.
AU - Gill-Barman, B.
AU - George, S.
AU - Ong, M.
AU - Waters, J.
AU - Cominos, M.
AU - Sevitt, T.
AU - Hynes, O.
AU - Tham, G.
AU - Bott, R. K.
AU - Dunn, J. M.
AU - Zeki, S. S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Background: Peri-operative chemotherapy improves survival in patients with locally advanced oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma. Two regimens with proven survival benefits are epirubicin, cisplatin plus capecitabine or fluorouracil (Medical Research Council Adjuvant Gastric Infusional Chemotherapy, MAGIC) and fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT). This study aimed to compare the effect of these regimens on survival (primary aim) and pathological response, surgical complications, adverse events and chemotherapy completion rates. Methods: Cohort study including 946 patients treated with FLOT (n = 257) or MAGIC (n = 689) who underwent surgical resection for oesophageal (n = 743) or gastric (n = 203) adenocarcinoma between 2002 and 2021 at St Thomas’ Hospital or The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK. Survival analysis was performed using multivariable Cox regression, providing hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted for age, sex, clinical T-stage, clinical N-stage, tumour grade and presence of signet ring cells. Results: Patients treated with FLOT had better overall survival (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.50–0.94) and disease-free survival (HR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.58–0.98) than MAGIC. Patients treated with FLOT were more likely to have a complete pathological response (9.5% FLOT versus 5.5% MAGIC, p = 0.027) and were less likely to have a positive resection margin (19.1% FLOT versus 32.2% MAGIC, p < 0.001). The stratified analysis revealed similar results for oesophageal and gastric tumours. Rates of surgical complications, chemotherapy-associated adverse events and completion were similarly distributed between treatment groups. Conclusions: Patients with oesophageal or gastric adenocarcinoma treated with peri-operative FLOT had better survival and pathological response than those treated with peri-operative MAGIC. Rates of surgical complications, adverse events and chemotherapy completion were comparable.
AB - Background: Peri-operative chemotherapy improves survival in patients with locally advanced oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma. Two regimens with proven survival benefits are epirubicin, cisplatin plus capecitabine or fluorouracil (Medical Research Council Adjuvant Gastric Infusional Chemotherapy, MAGIC) and fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT). This study aimed to compare the effect of these regimens on survival (primary aim) and pathological response, surgical complications, adverse events and chemotherapy completion rates. Methods: Cohort study including 946 patients treated with FLOT (n = 257) or MAGIC (n = 689) who underwent surgical resection for oesophageal (n = 743) or gastric (n = 203) adenocarcinoma between 2002 and 2021 at St Thomas’ Hospital or The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK. Survival analysis was performed using multivariable Cox regression, providing hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted for age, sex, clinical T-stage, clinical N-stage, tumour grade and presence of signet ring cells. Results: Patients treated with FLOT had better overall survival (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.50–0.94) and disease-free survival (HR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.58–0.98) than MAGIC. Patients treated with FLOT were more likely to have a complete pathological response (9.5% FLOT versus 5.5% MAGIC, p = 0.027) and were less likely to have a positive resection margin (19.1% FLOT versus 32.2% MAGIC, p < 0.001). The stratified analysis revealed similar results for oesophageal and gastric tumours. Rates of surgical complications, chemotherapy-associated adverse events and completion were similarly distributed between treatment groups. Conclusions: Patients with oesophageal or gastric adenocarcinoma treated with peri-operative FLOT had better survival and pathological response than those treated with peri-operative MAGIC. Rates of surgical complications, adverse events and chemotherapy completion were comparable.
KW - Antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols
KW - Gastric neoplasms
KW - Oesophageal neoplasms
KW - Surgical oncology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123443033&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.12.021
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.12.021
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85123443033
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 163
SP - 180
EP - 188
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
ER -