Effect of ultrasound on adherent microbubble contrast agents

Jonathan Loughran, Charles Sennoga, Robert J. Eckersley, Meng-Xing Tang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An investigation into the effect of clinical ultrasound exposure on adherent microbubbles is described. A flow phantom was constructed in which targeted microbubbles were attached using biotin-streptavidin linkages. Microbubbles were insonated by broadband imaging pulses (centred at 2.25 MHz) over a range of pressures (peak negative pressure (PNP) = 60-375 kPa). Individual adherent bubbles were observed optically and classified as either being isolated or with a single neighbouring bubble. It is found that bubble detachment and deflation are two significant effects, even during low amplitude ultrasound exposure. Specifically, while at very low acoustic pressure (PNP < 75 kPa) 95% of the bubbles were not affected, at medium pressure (151 kPa < P < 225 kPa) 53% of the bubbles detached and at higher pressures (301 kPa < P < 375 kPa) 96% of the bubbles detached. In addition, more than 50% of the bubbles underwent deflation at pressures between 301 and 375 kPa. At pressures between 226 and 300 kPa, more adherent bubbles detached when there was a neighbouring bubble, suggesting the role of multiple scattering and secondary Bjerknes force on bubble detachment. The flow shear, primary and secondary Bjerknes forces exerted on each bubble were calculated and compared to the estimated forces acting on the bubble due to oscillations. The oscillation force is shown to be much higher than other forces. The mechanisms of bubble detachment are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6999-7014
Number of pages16
JournalPhysics in Medicine and Biology
Volume57
Issue number21
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Nov 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of ultrasound on adherent microbubble contrast agents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this