TY - JOUR
T1 - Employability in the post-job security era: testing competing effects of perceived job insecurity on perceived employability change
AU - Doden, Wiebke
AU - Grosemans, Ilke
AU - De Cuyper, Nele
AU - Tschopp, Cécile
AU - Grote, Gudela
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Perceived job insecurity and perceived employability are often mentioned in one breath with employ-ability typically referred to as the “modern response to job insecurity”. Yet our understanding of how individuals’ perceptions of employability may change over time in response to job insecurity is limited. Both positive and negative changes seem plausible: Job insecurity may trigger employees to invest in employability, making them feel more employable. However, job insecurity may also elicit a defensive response in employees that undermines their perceived employability. We tested these two competing hypotheses against the background of conservation of resources theory in a sample of 358 employees surveyed on three occasions across 3.5 years. Using latent change score modelling, our findings suggest that job insecurity increases perceived employability. That is, the state-level of perceived job insecurity predicts a positive subsequent change in perceived employability. These findings highlight the impor-tance of considering the dynamic within-person perspective to understand the relationship between job insecurity and perceived employability, and illustrate that results observed in prior static research may lead to different conclusions in within-person longitudinal studies. Implications of our findings for theory and practice are discussed.
AB - Perceived job insecurity and perceived employability are often mentioned in one breath with employ-ability typically referred to as the “modern response to job insecurity”. Yet our understanding of how individuals’ perceptions of employability may change over time in response to job insecurity is limited. Both positive and negative changes seem plausible: Job insecurity may trigger employees to invest in employability, making them feel more employable. However, job insecurity may also elicit a defensive response in employees that undermines their perceived employability. We tested these two competing hypotheses against the background of conservation of resources theory in a sample of 358 employees surveyed on three occasions across 3.5 years. Using latent change score modelling, our findings suggest that job insecurity increases perceived employability. That is, the state-level of perceived job insecurity predicts a positive subsequent change in perceived employability. These findings highlight the impor-tance of considering the dynamic within-person perspective to understand the relationship between job insecurity and perceived employability, and illustrate that results observed in prior static research may lead to different conclusions in within-person longitudinal studies. Implications of our findings for theory and practice are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85173723577&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/1359432X.2023.2263201
DO - 10.1080/1359432X.2023.2263201
M3 - Article
SN - 1359-432X
VL - 33
SP - 11
EP - 23
JO - EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY
JF - EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY
IS - 1
ER -