Empowerment and satisfaction in a multinational study of routine clinical practice

Eleanor Jane Clarke, B. Puschner, Harriet Isabel Jordan, Paul Williams, J. Konrad, Wolfram Kawohl, Arlette Bar, W Rossler, V. Del Vecchio, G. Sampogna, Marietta Nagy, A Suvegese, M. Frokjaer Krogsgaard Bording, Mike Dominic Slade

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective:
Decision-making between mental health clinicians and patients is under-researched. We tested whether mental health patients are more satisfied with a decision made (i) using their preferred decision-making style and (ii) with a clinician with the same decision-making style preference.

Method:
As part of the CEDAR Study (ISRCTN75841675), a convenience sample of 445 patients with severe mental illness from six European countries were assessed for desired clinical decision-making style (rated by patients and paired clinicians), decision-specific experienced style and satisfaction.

Results:
Patients who experienced more involvement in decision-making than they desired rated higher satisfaction (OR = 2.47, P = 0.005, 95% CI 1.32–4.63). Decisions made with clinicians whose decision-making style preference was for more active involvement than the patient preference were rated with higher satisfaction (OR = 3.17, P = 0.003, 95% CI 1.48–6.82).

Conclusion:
More active involvement in decision-making than the patient stated as desired was associated with higher satisfaction. A clinical orientation towards empowering, rather than shared, decision-making may maximise satisfaction.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)369-378
Number of pages10
JournalActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Volume131
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Empowerment and satisfaction in a multinational study of routine clinical practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this