Exploring the compatibility of biomedical and psychological approaches to treating psychosis

Charles Heriot-Maitland*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The recent UK clinical guidelines for psychosis require an integration of biomedical and psychological treatment approaches that may present challenges to the structure and delivery of services. This review briefly outlines these two approaches before presenting arguments both for and against their compatibility. Although this discussion recognises attempts at integrating the approaches in modern mainstream services, it argues that their fundamental theoretical differences entail very different treatment methods, and often require conflicting demands of clients. Not only is this potentially confusing and unhelpful to the clients, but it also interferes with the goals and processes of each approach. Some of the main challenges to integration are discussed, and suggestions are made regarding the future direction of multidisciplinary treatments for psychosis. This review argues that an open, critical examination of existing professional models and practices is required to ensure that optimal service provision.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)133-140
Number of pages8
JournalPsychosis-Psychological social and integrative approaches
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Keywords

  • causal explanations
  • treatment planning
  • clinical psychology
  • formulation
  • biochemical theories
  • SCHIZOPHRENIA
  • MODEL

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring the compatibility of biomedical and psychological approaches to treating psychosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this