Extraction of chronic pacemaker and defibrillator leads from the coronary sinus: laser infrequently used but required

Shoaib Hamid, Aruna Arujuna, Aruna Arujna, Sitara Khan, Andrew Ladwiniec, Mark McPhail, Julian Bostock, Margaret Mobb, Nik Patel, Cliff Bucknall, Christopher A Rinaldi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy is an accepted treatment for heart failure but it may be necessary to explant these systems along with their leads. The evidence base for coronary sinus (CS) lead extractions is limited. We aimed to evaluate the percutaneous removal of these leads and the utility of laser extraction when necessary.

METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 265 patients referred for lead extraction between January 2004 and June 2008, 32 (12.1%) involved CS leads (30 males, mean age 67 years). Mean implantation time was 26.5 +/- 28.7 months (range 1-116 months). Indications for extraction were pocket infection (34.4%), lead malfunction (43.8%), skin erosion (15.6%), and endocarditis (6.2%). Twenty-eight (87.5%) CS leads were removed with manual traction, with laser utilized in four cases (12.5%). No major complications of CS laceration, pericardial effusion, emergency surgery, or death occurred.

CONCLUSION: Our experience supports the percutaneous extraction of CS leads as a safe and effective procedure including the utility of laser when necessary.

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects
  • Coronary Sinus/surgery
  • Defibrillators, Implantable
  • Device Removal/adverse effects
  • Female
  • Heart Diseases/therapy
  • Humans
  • Laser Therapy/adverse effects
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pacemaker, Artificial
  • Prospective Studies
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Extraction of chronic pacemaker and defibrillator leads from the coronary sinus: laser infrequently used but required'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this