Abstract
Background: Bone-containing vascularized grafts have been used successfully to reconstruct post-cancer surgical defects. Dental implants can be placed in these bone-containing grafts to allow implant-supported prosthodontic reconstruction of these patients.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival of dental implants used in the rehabilitation of subjects treated with bone-containing vascularized grafts to compare usability of implants placed at the time of reconstruction and after healing.
Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was undertaken to examine survival rates of implants placed in vascularized bone-containing grafts either immediately at the time of surgical reconstruction or after 3 months healing. Other factors such as graft type, whether radiation therapy was given, and implant type were recorded.
Results: A total of 41 patients had 145 implants placed in 47 vascularized bone-containing flaps. Increased failure rate of implants was seen in immediately placed implants. There was also a significant increase in the number of osseointegrated implants that were prosthodontically unusable or sub-optimally placed in the immediate placement group. Radiation therapy was associated with a significant increase in failure rate. Modern implant surfaces appeared to perform better than machined/turned surfaces. Graft donor site did not influence implant survival.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated the difficulties encountered with immediate placement of dental implants at the time of post-cancer reconstructive surgery.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival of dental implants used in the rehabilitation of subjects treated with bone-containing vascularized grafts to compare usability of implants placed at the time of reconstruction and after healing.
Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was undertaken to examine survival rates of implants placed in vascularized bone-containing grafts either immediately at the time of surgical reconstruction or after 3 months healing. Other factors such as graft type, whether radiation therapy was given, and implant type were recorded.
Results: A total of 41 patients had 145 implants placed in 47 vascularized bone-containing flaps. Increased failure rate of implants was seen in immediately placed implants. There was also a significant increase in the number of osseointegrated implants that were prosthodontically unusable or sub-optimally placed in the immediate placement group. Radiation therapy was associated with a significant increase in failure rate. Modern implant surfaces appeared to perform better than machined/turned surfaces. Graft donor site did not influence implant survival.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated the difficulties encountered with immediate placement of dental implants at the time of post-cancer reconstructive surgery.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 266-272 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Clinical Implant Dentistry & Related Research |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2012 |
Keywords
- Bone Transplantation
- Cross-Sectional Studies
- Dental Implantation, Endosseous
- Dental Implants
- Dental Prosthesis Design
- Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported
- Dental Restoration Failure
- Dentistry, Operative
- Head and Neck Neoplasms
- Humans
- Mandible
- Maxilla
- Osseointegration
- Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
- Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
- Surface Properties
- Surgery, Oral
- Survival Analysis
- Transplant Donor Site
- Treatment Outcome
- Wound Healing