Flame-front rate of spread estimates for moderate scale experimental fires are strongly influenced by measurement approach

Joshua M. Johnston*, Melanie J. Wheatley, Martin J. Wooster, Ronan Paugam, G. Matt Davies, Kaitlin A. Deboer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Understanding wildfire rate of spread (RoS) is often a key objective of many fire behavior modelling and measurement exercises. Using instrumented moderate scale laboratory burns we provide an assessment of eight different methods of flame front RoS determination, including visible imagery (VIS) analysis techniques, use of thermocouple arrays, and four thermal infrared (IR) image analysis approaches. We are able to (1) determine how measurement approach influences derived RoS, and (2) recommend the best method to reproduce the accepted standard (Thermocouple Grid Array measurement) RoS without ground sampling. We find that derived RoS is statistically significantly influenced by the measurement approach, and that failing to fully account for directionality of the RoS may result in significant error. We identify one of the thermal infrared imaging methods (described in Paugam et al. 2013), as the most appropriate for providing rate and direction of spread at these scales of measurement.

Original languageEnglish
Article number16
Pages (from-to)1-17
Number of pages17
JournalFire
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2018

Keywords

  • Fire behavior
  • Fire intensity
  • Infrared imaging
  • Method selection
  • Thermocouple
  • Visible imagery
  • Wildfire rate of spread

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Flame-front rate of spread estimates for moderate scale experimental fires are strongly influenced by measurement approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this