TY - JOUR
T1 - From mythical ‘standard’ to standard reality
T2 - The need for alternatives to standardized English language tests
AU - Jenkins, Jennifer
AU - Leung, Constant
PY - 2019/1/31
Y1 - 2019/1/31
N2 - This position paper builds on three of our earlier publications on the same subject (Jenkins & Leung 2014; Leung, Lewkowicz & Jenkins 2016; Jenkins & Leung 2017), as well as a number of conference papers we have given both jointly and individually. However, what we have not done up to this point is to propose alternatives to the large-scale standardized English tests administered by the major international examination boards, of which we have been so critical, despite the fact that we have been discussing other possibilities among ourselves for several years. The opportunity to publish a position paper on English language assessment therefore provided an ideal opportunity to present our alternatives, and this we do in the final part of the paper.
AB - This position paper builds on three of our earlier publications on the same subject (Jenkins & Leung 2014; Leung, Lewkowicz & Jenkins 2016; Jenkins & Leung 2017), as well as a number of conference papers we have given both jointly and individually. However, what we have not done up to this point is to propose alternatives to the large-scale standardized English tests administered by the major international examination boards, of which we have been so critical, despite the fact that we have been discussing other possibilities among ourselves for several years. The opportunity to publish a position paper on English language assessment therefore provided an ideal opportunity to present our alternatives, and this we do in the final part of the paper.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061790782&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0261444818000307
DO - 10.1017/S0261444818000307
M3 - Article
SN - 0261-4448
VL - 52
SP - 86
EP - 110
JO - Language Teaching
JF - Language Teaching
IS - 1
ER -