Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most frequent neurodegenerative disease with an increasing prevalence in industrialized, aging populations. AD susceptibility has an established genetic basis which has been the focus of a large number of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) published over the last decade. Most of these GWAS used dichotomized clinical diagnostic status, i.e., case vs. control classification, as outcome phenotypes, without the use of biomarkers. An alternative and potentially more powerful study design is afforded by using quantitative AD-related phenotypes as GWAS outcome traits, an analysis paradigm that we followed in this work. Specifically, we utilized genotype and phenotype data from n = 931 individuals collected under the auspices of the European Medical Information Framework for Alzheimer’s Disease Multimodal Biomarker Discovery (EMIF-AD MBD) study to perform a total of 19 separate GWAS analyses. As outcomes we used five magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) traits and seven cognitive performance traits. For the latter, longitudinal data from at least two timepoints were available in addition to cross-sectional assessments at baseline. Our GWAS analyses revealed several genome-wide significant associations for the neuropsychological performance measures, in particular those assayed longitudinally. Among the most noteworthy signals were associations in or near EHBP1 (EH domain binding protein 1; on chromosome 2p15) and CEP112 (centrosomal protein 112; 17q24.1) with delayed recall as well as SMOC2 (SPARC related modular calcium binding 2; 6p27) with immediate recall in a memory performance test. On the X chromosome, which is often excluded in other GWAS, we identified a genome-wide significant signal near IL1RAPL1 (interleukin 1 receptor accessory protein like 1; Xp21.3). While polygenic score (PGS) analyses showed the expected strong associations with SNPs highlighted in relevant previous GWAS on hippocampal volume and cognitive function, they did not show noteworthy associations with recent AD risk GWAS findings. In summary, our study highlights the power of using quantitative endophenotypes as outcome traits in AD-related GWAS analyses and nominates several new loci not previously implicated in cognitive decline.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 840651 |
Journal | Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience |
Volume | 14 |
Early online date | 21 Mar 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 21 Mar 2022 |
Keywords
- Alzheimer’s disease (AD)
- cognitive function
- genome-wide association study
- GWAS
- imaging
- MRI
- X chromosome
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Genome-Wide Association Study of Alzheimer’s Disease Brain Imaging Biomarkers and Neuropsychological Phenotypes in the European Medical Information Framework for Alzheimer’s Disease Multimodal Biomarker Discovery Dataset'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
In: Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, Vol. 14, 840651, 21.03.2022.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Genome-Wide Association Study of Alzheimer’s Disease Brain Imaging Biomarkers and Neuropsychological Phenotypes in the European Medical Information Framework for Alzheimer’s Disease Multimodal Biomarker Discovery Dataset
AU - Homann, Jan
AU - Osburg, Tim
AU - Ohlei, Olena
AU - Dobricic, Valerija
AU - Deecke, Laura
AU - Bos, Isabelle
AU - Vandenberghe, Rik
AU - Gabel, Silvy
AU - Scheltens, Philip
AU - Teunissen, Charlotte E.
AU - Engelborghs, Sebastiaan
AU - Frisoni, Giovanni
AU - Blin, Olivier
AU - Richardson, Jill C.
AU - Bordet, Regis
AU - Lleó, Alberto
AU - Alcolea, Daniel
AU - Popp, Julius
AU - Clark, Christopher
AU - Peyratout, Gwendoline
AU - Martinez-Lage, Pablo
AU - Tainta, Mikel
AU - Dobson, Richard J.B.
AU - Legido-Quigley, Cristina
AU - Sleegers, Kristel
AU - Van Broeckhoven, Christine
AU - Wittig, Michael
AU - Franke, Andre
AU - Lill, Christina M.
AU - Blennow, Kaj
AU - Zetterberg, Henrik
AU - Lovestone, Simon
AU - Streffer, Johannes
AU - ten Kate, Mara
AU - Vos, Stephanie J.B.
AU - Barkhof, Frederik
AU - Visser, Pieter Jelle
AU - Bertram, Lars
N1 - Funding Information: HZ has served at scientific advisory boards and/or as a consultant for Abbvie, Alector, Annexon, Artery Therapeutics, AZTherapies, CogRx, Denali, Eisai, Nervgen, Pinteon Therapeutics, Red Abbey Labs, Passage Bio, Roche, Samumed, Siemens Healthineers, Triplet Therapeutics, and Wave, has given lectures in symposia sponsored by Cellectricon, Fujirebio, Alzecure, Biogen, and Roche, and was a co-founder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB (BBS), which was a part of the GU Ventures Incubator Program. FB is supported by the NIHR biomedical research centre at UCLH. JP received consultation honoraria from Nestle Institute of Health Sciences, Ono Pharma, OM Pharma, and Fujirebio, unrelated to the submitted work. CT has a collaboration contract with ADx Neurosciences, Quanterix and Eli Lilly, performed contract research or received grants from AC-Immune, Axon Neurosciences, Biogen, Brainstorm Therapeutics, Celgene, EIP Pharma, Eisai, PeopleBio, Roche, Toyama, Vivoryon. She serves on editorial boards of Medidact Neurologie/Springer, Alzheimer Research and Therapy, Neurology: Neuroimmunology and Neuroinflammation, and was editor of a Neuromethods book Springer. CT also holds a speaker’s contract with Roche, Inc. KB has served as a consultant, at advisory boards, or at data monitoring committees for Abcam, Axon, BioArctic, Biogen, JOMDD/Shimadzu. Julius Clinical, Lilly, MagQu, Novartis, Pharmatrophix, Prothena, Roche Diagnostics, and Siemens Healthineers, and was a co-founder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB (BBS), which was a part of the GU Ventures Incubator Program, outside the work presented in this paper. SL is currently an employee at Janssen Medical UK. JS was an employee of Janssen R&D, LLC., and is currently an employee and chief medical officer of AC Immune SA. JR was an employee of Neurosciences Therapeutic Area, GlaxoSmithKline R&D, Stevenage, UK. Funding Information: We acknowledge the assistance of Ellen De Roeck, Naomi De Roeck, and Hanne Struyfs (UAntwerp) with data collection. We thank Tanja Wesse and Sanaz Sedghpour Sabet at the Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany for technical assistance with the GSA genotyping. We thank Fabian Kilpert for his assistance with the QC and genotype imputations and Marcel Schilling for his assistance on visualizing the results. The LIGA team acknowledges computational support from the OMICS compute cluster at the University of Lübeck. Funding Information: The present study was conducted as part of the EMIF-AD MBD project, which has received support from the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking under EMIF grant agreement No. 115372, the resources of which were composed of financial contribution from the European Union?s Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) and EFPIA companies? in kind contribution. Parts of this study were made possible through support from the German Research Foundation (DFG grant FOR2488: Main support by subproject ?INF-GDAC? BE2287/7-1 to LB) and the Cure Alzheimer?s Fund (to LB). RV acknowledges support by the Stichting Alzheimer Onderzoek (#13007, #11020, #2017-032) and the Flemish Government (VIND IWT 135043). KB was supported by the Swedish Research Council (#2017-00915), the Alzheimer Drug Discovery Foundation (ADDF), United States (#RDAPB-201809-2016615), the Swedish Alzheimer Foundation (#AF-742881), Hj?rnfonden, Sweden (#FO2017-0243), the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish Government and the County Councils, the ALF-agreement (#ALFGBG-715986), European Union Joint Program for Neurodegenerative Disorders (JPND2019-466-236), and the Alzheimer?s Association 2021 Zenith Award (ZEN-21-848495). HZ was a Wallenberg Scholar supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council (#2018-02532), the European Research Council (#681712), and Swedish State Support for Clinical Research (#ALFGBG-720931). SV received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking under ROADMAP grant agreement No. 116020 and from ZonMw during the conduct of this study. Research at VIB-UAntwerp was in part supported by the University of Antwerp Research Fund and SAO-FRA 2018 0016. Funding Information: The present study was conducted as part of the EMIF-AD MBD project, which has received support from the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking under EMIF grant agreement No. 115372, the resources of which were composed of financial contribution from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) and EFPIA companies’ in kind contribution. Parts of this study were made possible through support from the German Research Foundation (DFG grant FOR2488: Main support by subproject “INF-GDAC” BE2287/7-1 to LB) and the Cure Alzheimer’s Fund (to LB). RV acknowledges support by the Stichting Alzheimer Onderzoek (#13007, #11020, #2017-032) and the Flemish Government (VIND IWT 135043). KB was supported by the Swedish Research Council (#2017-00915), the Alzheimer Drug Discovery Foundation (ADDF), United States (#RDAPB-201809-2016615), the Swedish Alzheimer Foundation (#AF-742881), Hjärnfonden, Sweden (#FO2017-0243), the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish Government and the County Councils, the ALF-agreement (#ALFGBG-715986), European Union Joint Program for Neurodegenerative Disorders (JPND2019-466-236), and the Alzheimer’s Association 2021 Zenith Award (ZEN-21-848495). HZ was a Wallenberg Scholar supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council (#2018-02532), the European Research Council (#681712), and Swedish State Support for Clinical Research (#ALFGBG-720931). SV received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking under ROADMAP grant agreement No. 116020 and from ZonMw during the conduct of this study. Research at VIB-UAntwerp was in part supported by the University of Antwerp Research Fund and SAO-FRA 2018 0016. The Lausanne study was funded by a grant from the Swiss National Research Foundation (SNF 320030_141179) to JP. Research of CT was supported by the European Commission [Marie Curie International Training Network, grant agreement No 860197 (MIRIADE), and JPND], Health Holland, the Dutch Research Council (ZonMW), Alzheimer Drug Discovery Foundation, the Selfridges Group Foundation, Alzheimer Netherlands, Alzheimer Association. CT was recipient of ABOARD, which was a public-private partnership receiving funding from ZonMW (#73305095007) and Health∼Holland, Topsector Life Sciences and Health (PPP-allowance; #LSHM20106). More than 30 partners participate in ABOARD. ABOARD also received funding from Edwin Bouw Fonds and Gieskes-Strijbisfonds. RD was supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London, London, United Kingdom; Health Data Research UK, which was funded by the UK Medical Research Council, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Department of Health and Social Care (England), Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates, Health and Social Care Research and Development Division (Welsh Government), Public Health Agency (Northern Ireland), British Heart Foundation and Wellcome Trust; the BigData@Heart Consortium, funded by the Innovative Medicines Initiative-2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No. 116074. This Joint Undertaking received support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme and EFPIA; it is chaired by DE Grobbee and SD Anker, partnering with 20 academic and industry partners and ESC; the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre; the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London; the UK Research and Innovation London Medical Imaging and Artificial Intelligence Centre for Value-Based Healthcare; and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration South London (NIHR ARC South London) at King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. We acknowledge financial support by Land Schleswig-Holstein within the funding programme Open Access Publikationsförderung. Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2022 Homann, Osburg, Ohlei, Dobricic, Deecke, Bos, Vandenberghe, Gabel, Scheltens, Teunissen, Engelborghs, Frisoni, Blin, Richardson, Bordet, Lleó, Alcolea, Popp, Clark, Peyratout, Martinez-Lage, Tainta, Dobson, Legido-Quigley, Sleegers, Van Broeckhoven, Wittig, Franke, Lill, Blennow, Zetterberg, Lovestone, Streffer, ten Kate, Vos, Barkhof, Visser and Bertram.
PY - 2022/3/21
Y1 - 2022/3/21
N2 - Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most frequent neurodegenerative disease with an increasing prevalence in industrialized, aging populations. AD susceptibility has an established genetic basis which has been the focus of a large number of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) published over the last decade. Most of these GWAS used dichotomized clinical diagnostic status, i.e., case vs. control classification, as outcome phenotypes, without the use of biomarkers. An alternative and potentially more powerful study design is afforded by using quantitative AD-related phenotypes as GWAS outcome traits, an analysis paradigm that we followed in this work. Specifically, we utilized genotype and phenotype data from n = 931 individuals collected under the auspices of the European Medical Information Framework for Alzheimer’s Disease Multimodal Biomarker Discovery (EMIF-AD MBD) study to perform a total of 19 separate GWAS analyses. As outcomes we used five magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) traits and seven cognitive performance traits. For the latter, longitudinal data from at least two timepoints were available in addition to cross-sectional assessments at baseline. Our GWAS analyses revealed several genome-wide significant associations for the neuropsychological performance measures, in particular those assayed longitudinally. Among the most noteworthy signals were associations in or near EHBP1 (EH domain binding protein 1; on chromosome 2p15) and CEP112 (centrosomal protein 112; 17q24.1) with delayed recall as well as SMOC2 (SPARC related modular calcium binding 2; 6p27) with immediate recall in a memory performance test. On the X chromosome, which is often excluded in other GWAS, we identified a genome-wide significant signal near IL1RAPL1 (interleukin 1 receptor accessory protein like 1; Xp21.3). While polygenic score (PGS) analyses showed the expected strong associations with SNPs highlighted in relevant previous GWAS on hippocampal volume and cognitive function, they did not show noteworthy associations with recent AD risk GWAS findings. In summary, our study highlights the power of using quantitative endophenotypes as outcome traits in AD-related GWAS analyses and nominates several new loci not previously implicated in cognitive decline.
AB - Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most frequent neurodegenerative disease with an increasing prevalence in industrialized, aging populations. AD susceptibility has an established genetic basis which has been the focus of a large number of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) published over the last decade. Most of these GWAS used dichotomized clinical diagnostic status, i.e., case vs. control classification, as outcome phenotypes, without the use of biomarkers. An alternative and potentially more powerful study design is afforded by using quantitative AD-related phenotypes as GWAS outcome traits, an analysis paradigm that we followed in this work. Specifically, we utilized genotype and phenotype data from n = 931 individuals collected under the auspices of the European Medical Information Framework for Alzheimer’s Disease Multimodal Biomarker Discovery (EMIF-AD MBD) study to perform a total of 19 separate GWAS analyses. As outcomes we used five magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) traits and seven cognitive performance traits. For the latter, longitudinal data from at least two timepoints were available in addition to cross-sectional assessments at baseline. Our GWAS analyses revealed several genome-wide significant associations for the neuropsychological performance measures, in particular those assayed longitudinally. Among the most noteworthy signals were associations in or near EHBP1 (EH domain binding protein 1; on chromosome 2p15) and CEP112 (centrosomal protein 112; 17q24.1) with delayed recall as well as SMOC2 (SPARC related modular calcium binding 2; 6p27) with immediate recall in a memory performance test. On the X chromosome, which is often excluded in other GWAS, we identified a genome-wide significant signal near IL1RAPL1 (interleukin 1 receptor accessory protein like 1; Xp21.3). While polygenic score (PGS) analyses showed the expected strong associations with SNPs highlighted in relevant previous GWAS on hippocampal volume and cognitive function, they did not show noteworthy associations with recent AD risk GWAS findings. In summary, our study highlights the power of using quantitative endophenotypes as outcome traits in AD-related GWAS analyses and nominates several new loci not previously implicated in cognitive decline.
KW - Alzheimer’s disease (AD)
KW - cognitive function
KW - genome-wide association study
KW - GWAS
KW - imaging
KW - MRI
KW - X chromosome
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127943672&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fnagi.2022.840651
DO - 10.3389/fnagi.2022.840651
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85127943672
SN - 1663-4365
VL - 14
JO - Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
JF - Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
M1 - 840651
ER -