TY - JOUR
T1 - Geographic mythology and global health
AU - Herrick, Clare
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by American Association of Geographers.
Funding Information:
This research was made possible by a Faculty Research Fund grant from King’s College London. Thank you to everyone who took the time to speak to me in the course of this project, as well as to the insightful interventions made by the three reviewers.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by American Association of Geographers.
PY - 2023/4/26
Y1 - 2023/4/26
N2 - Abdel Omran’s epidemiological transition theory has become a convenient heuristic device for explaining shifts in the global distribution of disease. In turn, the temporal and geographic transition from “pandemics of infection” to “degenerative and man-made diseases” (Omran 1971, 161) as countries develop has become part of the mythology of global health. Such myths are powerful not because they are necessarily clearly true or false, but rather for what they naturalize or oversimplify (Essebro 2018). Drawing on the example of the work undertaken over the past three decades to ensure the prioritization of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) as a problem of and for development within global health agendas, I draw on documentary and interview data to examine the origins and residual power of myths. Within this field, geographic myths (see Blaut 2006) about the social, economic, and spatial distribution of morbidity and mortality are a pervasive and persistent challenge for advocates trying to emphasize the threat of NCDs to the Global South. In examining the myth work undertaken by advocates, this article offers novel geographic perspectives to the critical global health field, while also arguing for the centrality of global health to geography as a discipline.
AB - Abdel Omran’s epidemiological transition theory has become a convenient heuristic device for explaining shifts in the global distribution of disease. In turn, the temporal and geographic transition from “pandemics of infection” to “degenerative and man-made diseases” (Omran 1971, 161) as countries develop has become part of the mythology of global health. Such myths are powerful not because they are necessarily clearly true or false, but rather for what they naturalize or oversimplify (Essebro 2018). Drawing on the example of the work undertaken over the past three decades to ensure the prioritization of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) as a problem of and for development within global health agendas, I draw on documentary and interview data to examine the origins and residual power of myths. Within this field, geographic myths (see Blaut 2006) about the social, economic, and spatial distribution of morbidity and mortality are a pervasive and persistent challenge for advocates trying to emphasize the threat of NCDs to the Global South. In examining the myth work undertaken by advocates, this article offers novel geographic perspectives to the critical global health field, while also arguing for the centrality of global health to geography as a discipline.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85153405271&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/24694452.2023.2187755
DO - 10.1080/24694452.2023.2187755
M3 - Article
SN - 2469-4452
VL - 113
SP - 1516
EP - 1533
JO - Annals of the American Association of Geographers
JF - Annals of the American Association of Geographers
IS - 6
ER -