Healthcare Cost Impact of Continued Anticoagulation with Rivaroxaban versus Aspirin for Prevention of Recurrent Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism in the EINSTEIN-CHOICE Trial Population

Philip S. Wells, Martin H. Prins, Jan Beyer-Westendorf, Anthonie WA. Lensing, Lloyd Haskell, Bennett Levitan, François Laliberté, Veronica Ashton, Yongling Xiao, Dominique Lejeune, Concetta Crivera, Patrick Lefebvre, Qi Zhao, Zhong Yuan, Jeff Schein, Paolo Prandoni

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)
    163 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Background Using data from the Reduced-dosed Rivaroxaban in the Long-term Prevention of Recurrent Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism (EINSTEIN-CHOICE) trial, this study assessed cost impact of continued anticoagulation therapy with rivaroxaban vs. aspirin. Methods Total healthcare costs (2016USD) associated with rivaroxaban and aspirin were calculated as the sum of clinical event costs and drug costs from a US managed care perspective. Clinical event costs were calculated by multiplying event rate by cost of care. One-year Kaplan-Meier clinical event rates for recurrent pulmonary embolism, recurrent deep-vein thrombosis, all-cause mortality, and bleeding were obtained from EINSTEIN-CHOICE. Cost of care was determined by literature review. Drug costs were the product of drug price (wholesale acquisition cost) and treatment duration. A one-way sensitivity analysis was conducted. Results Rivaroxaban users had lower per patient per month (PPPM) clinical event costs compared with aspirin users ($123, $ 243, and $381 for rivaroxaban 10mg, rivaroxaban 20mg, and aspirin, respectively). However, vs. aspirin, PPPM total healthcare costs were $24 higher for rivaroxaban 10mg treated patients ($143 higher for rivaroxaban 20mg) due to higher cost of rivaroxaban. With a 15% discount for rivaroxaban 10mg, the lower cost of clinical events for the rivaroxaban-treated patients more than fully offset the higher drug costs, and yielded a $19 lower total healthcare cost. Conclusions Continued therapy with rivaroxaban 10mg and 20mg vs. aspirin was associated with lower clinical event costs but higher total healthcare costs; with a 15% drug discount rivaroxaban 10mg had lower total healthcare costs than aspirin.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalChest
    Early online date7 Sept 2018
    DOIs
    Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 7 Sept 2018

    Keywords

    • anticoagulants
    • cost comparison
    • economic analysis
    • extended treatment
    • aspirin
    • rivaroxaban
    • recurrent venous thromboembolism

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Healthcare Cost Impact of Continued Anticoagulation with Rivaroxaban versus Aspirin for Prevention of Recurrent Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism in the EINSTEIN-CHOICE Trial Population'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this