Abstract
Purpose: To prospectively compare transit times of Levovist and SonoVue in healthy volunteers and patients with biopsyproved hepatitis C-related liver disease.
Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Forty patients and 25 healthy volunteers were examined. Subjects fasted, a bolus of SonoVue (0.6 mL) was injected into a cubital fossa vein, and hepatic venous time-intensity profiles were measured with spectral Doppler tracing. This was repeated with two injections of Levovist (2 g) and another injection of SonoVue. Time-intensity curves of spectral Doppler signals of right and middle hepatic veins were analyzed. A sustained signal intensity increase of 10% above baseline levels indicated hepatic vein transit time (HVTT). Carotid artery audio intensity was measured in volunteers. Analysis of variance and t tests were used for statistical analysis.
Results: Twelve patients had mild hepatitis; 18, moderate or severe hepatitis; and 10, cirrhosis. Mean HVTTs in control, mild hepatitis, moderate or severe hepatitis, and cirrhosis groups were 38.3 seconds +/- 2.4 (standard error), 47.5 seconds +/- 6.5, 29.5 seconds +/- 10.8, and 17.6 seconds +/- 5.0, respectively, with Levovist (P <.001) and 29.4 seconds +/- 6.9, 27.4 seconds +/- 9.3, 22.9 seconds +/- 4.7, and 16.4 seconds +/- 4.9, respectively, with SonoVue (P <.001). HVTT decreased as severity increased at imaging with both contrast agents. There was no significant difference in HVTT between mild and moderate hepatitis groups with SonoVue; however, there were significant differences in HVTT between all patient groups with Levovist. HVTT of SonoVue was shorter than that of Levovist in all groups (P <.001) except the cirrhosis group; in this group, HVTT of the two contrast agents was similar (P <.05). No difference was observed in mean cardiopulmonary transit time for SonoVue or Levovist (9.1 seconds +/- 2.4 [standard error] and 8.4 seconds +/- 2.5, respectively, P = .18).
Conclusion: HVTT was significantly shorter with SonoVue than with Levovist; there was no significant difference in cardiopulmonary transit time.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 130-135 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Radiology |
Volume | 240 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2006 |
Keywords
- ULTRASOUND CONTRAST AGENT
- LIVER-DISEASE
- VOLUNTEERS
- METASTASES
- SONOGRAPHY
- CIRRHOSIS
- SEVERITY