Abstract

Service user contributions to mental health conferences are now routine. How effective they are at promoting dialogue is not clear. We report a difficult exchange following a presentation about coercive treatment, with our individual reflections on what we learnt. Suggestions are made to improve both the clinical practice and the dialogue.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)88-89
Number of pages2
JournalBritish Journal of Psychiatry
Volume203
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How can the service user voice be best heard at psychiatric meetings?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this