How should we manage information needs, family anxiety, depression, and breathlessness for those affected by advanced disease: Development of a Clinical Decision Support Tool using a Delphi design

Liesbeth M. van Vliet*, Richard Harding, Claudia Bausewein, Sheila Payne, Irene J. Higginson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)
234 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Clinicians request guidance to aid the routine use and interpretation of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), but tools are lacking. We aimed to develop a Clinical Decision Support Tool (CDST) focused on information needs, family anxiety, depression, and breathlessness (measured using the Palliative care Outcome Scale (POS)) and related PROM implementation guidance. Methods: We drafted recommendations based on findings from systematic literature searches. In a modified online Delphi study, 38 experts from 12 countries with different professional backgrounds, including four patient/carer representatives, were invited to rate the appropriateness of these recommendations for problems of varying severity in the CDST. The quality of evidence was added for each recommendation, and the final draft CDST reappraised by the experts. The accompanying implementation guidance was built on data from literature scoping with expert revision (n = 11 invited experts). Results: The systematic literature searches identified over 560 potential references, of which 43 met the inclusion criteria. Two Delphi rounds (response rate 66 % and 62 %; n = 25 and 23) found that good patient care, psychosocial support and empathy, and open communication were central to supporting patients and families affected by all POS concerns as a core requirement. Assessment was recommended for increasing problems (i.e. scores), followed by non-pharmacological interventions and for breathlessness and depression, pharmacological interventions. Accompanying PROM implementation guidance was built based on the 8-step International Society for Quality of Life Research framework, as revised by nine (response rate 82 %) experts. Conclusions: This CDST provides a straightforward guide to help support clinical care and improve evidence-based outcomes for patients with progressive illness and their families, addressing four areas of clinical uncertainty. Recommendations should be used flexibly, alongside skilled individual clinical assessment and knowledge, taking into account patients' and families' individual preferences, circumstances, and resources. The CDST is provided with accompanying implementation guidance to facilitate PROM use and is ready for further development and evaluation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number263
Number of pages20
JournalBMC Medicine
Volume13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Oct 2015

Keywords

  • Clinical decision support tools
  • Delphi studies
  • Implementation
  • Palliative care
  • Palliative care outcome scale (POS)
  • Patient reported outcome measures

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How should we manage information needs, family anxiety, depression, and breathlessness for those affected by advanced disease: Development of a Clinical Decision Support Tool using a Delphi design'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this