How to monitor SLE in routine clinical practice

M M A  Fernando; D A  Isenberg

doi:10.1136/ard.2003.015248

How to monitor SLE in routine clinical practice

M M A Fernando, D A Isenberg

Medical & Molecular Genetics

Baylor College of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A century ago syphilis was regarded as the great masquerader. Its modern equivalent is lupus. It may present to a wide range of specialists and its outcome, while much improved, remains uncertain in a significant number of patients.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	524-527
Number of pages	4
Journal	Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Volume	64
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2003.015248
Publication status	Published - Apr 2005

Access to Document

10.1136/ard.2003.015248

Cite this

@article{efba2d3813de4c3ab1759c01ec458fbb,

title = "How to monitor SLE in routine clinical practice",

abstract = "A century ago syphilis was regarded as the great masquerader. Its modern equivalent is lupus. It may present to a wide range of specialists and its outcome, while much improved, remains uncertain in a significant number of patients.",

author = "Fernando, {M M A} and Isenberg, {D A}",

year = "2005",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1136/ard.2003.015248",

language = "English",

volume = "64",

pages = "524--527",

journal = "Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases",

issn = "0003-4967",

publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to monitor SLE in routine clinical practice

AU - Fernando, M M A

AU - Isenberg, D A

PY - 2005/4

Y1 - 2005/4

N2 - A century ago syphilis was regarded as the great masquerader. Its modern equivalent is lupus. It may present to a wide range of specialists and its outcome, while much improved, remains uncertain in a significant number of patients.

AB - A century ago syphilis was regarded as the great masquerader. Its modern equivalent is lupus. It may present to a wide range of specialists and its outcome, while much improved, remains uncertain in a significant number of patients.

U2 - 10.1136/ard.2003.015248

DO - 10.1136/ard.2003.015248

M3 - Article

SN - 0003-4967

VL - 64

SP - 524

EP - 527

JO - Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

JF - Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

IS - 4

ER -

How to monitor SLE in routine clinical practice

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this