TY - JOUR
T1 - Humanizing Dehumanization Research
AU - Leader Maynard, Jonathan
AU - Luft, Aliza
N1 - Funding Information:
Our thanks to Johannes Lang, the special issue editors, the CRESP editorial team, and two anonymous reviewers, for their invaluable advice and support in helping us produce this article.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2023/4/16
Y1 - 2023/4/16
N2 - This essay contends that contemporary research should pay greater attention to three fundamentally human characteristics of dehumanization. First, we argue that scholars need to better consider and analyze the ideological context of dehumanization, specifically the multiple meanings that diverse cultural conceptions of the human and the dehumanized impart to dehumanizing concepts or attitudes. Second, we urge a greater emphasis on how social relationships influence dehumanization, recognizing that people are entangled in complex and intersecting social identities, relationships, and histories that affect how they respond to the dehumanizing intentions of others. Third, we argue that the institutional context of dehumanization must be investigated and theorized, as dehumanization’s effects are rarely the result of atomized individuals reacting to diffuse dehumanizing rhetoric but rather the result of collective action within more or less formal organizations. These tasks can be accomplished through increased interdisciplinarity, thereby enhancing the insights and applicability of dehumanization research to the numerous forms of conflict, brutality, and extremism that are so frequently associated with dehumanization.
AB - This essay contends that contemporary research should pay greater attention to three fundamentally human characteristics of dehumanization. First, we argue that scholars need to better consider and analyze the ideological context of dehumanization, specifically the multiple meanings that diverse cultural conceptions of the human and the dehumanized impart to dehumanizing concepts or attitudes. Second, we urge a greater emphasis on how social relationships influence dehumanization, recognizing that people are entangled in complex and intersecting social identities, relationships, and histories that affect how they respond to the dehumanizing intentions of others. Third, we argue that the institutional context of dehumanization must be investigated and theorized, as dehumanization’s effects are rarely the result of atomized individuals reacting to diffuse dehumanizing rhetoric but rather the result of collective action within more or less formal organizations. These tasks can be accomplished through increased interdisciplinarity, thereby enhancing the insights and applicability of dehumanization research to the numerous forms of conflict, brutality, and extremism that are so frequently associated with dehumanization.
KW - Violence
KW - Conflict
KW - Ideology
KW - Culture
KW - Dehumanization
KW - Human Rights
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85152473509&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cresp.2023.100102
DO - 10.1016/j.cresp.2023.100102
M3 - Article
SN - 2666-6227
VL - 4
JO - Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology
JF - Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology
M1 - 100102
ER -