TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of applied behaviour analysis (ABA) on carer burden and community participation in challenging behaviour
T2 - Results from a randomised controlled trial
AU - Hassiotis, A.
AU - Robotham, Daniel
AU - Canagasabey, A.
AU - Marston, L.
AU - Thomas, B.
AU - King, M.
PY - 2012/3/1
Y1 - 2012/3/1
N2 - Background: Applied behaviour analysis (ABA) reduces challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disability. There is interest, however, in whether such interventions reduce carer burden and increase community participation in this group. Methods: A 6-month randomised controlled trial was followed by a longer-term naturalistic follow-up of participants. We studied the impact of the challenging behaviour on the carers and on the daily activities of the participants measured by the Carer Uplift and Burden Scale and Guernsey Community Participation and Leisure Assessment respectively. Results: Both community participation and carer burden improved at 6 and 24 months. Burden showed significant reduction in family carers compared with paid carers. There was no significant intervention effect on the variables under consideration. Conclusions: ABA appears to be no more effective than standard care in improving social outcomes in people with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour but this requires further examination in a larger trial.
AB - Background: Applied behaviour analysis (ABA) reduces challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disability. There is interest, however, in whether such interventions reduce carer burden and increase community participation in this group. Methods: A 6-month randomised controlled trial was followed by a longer-term naturalistic follow-up of participants. We studied the impact of the challenging behaviour on the carers and on the daily activities of the participants measured by the Carer Uplift and Burden Scale and Guernsey Community Participation and Leisure Assessment respectively. Results: Both community participation and carer burden improved at 6 and 24 months. Burden showed significant reduction in family carers compared with paid carers. There was no significant intervention effect on the variables under consideration. Conclusions: ABA appears to be no more effective than standard care in improving social outcomes in people with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour but this requires further examination in a larger trial.
KW - Behavioural problems
KW - Carer burden
KW - Challenging behaviour
KW - Community participation
KW - Daily activities
KW - Engagement
KW - Intellectual disability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857059552&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01467.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01467.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 21917048
AN - SCOPUS:84857059552
SN - 0964-2633
VL - 56
SP - 285
EP - 290
JO - Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
JF - Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
IS - 3
ER -