'Instruments are good at eliciting information; scores are very dangerous': The perspectives of clinical professionals regarding neurodevelopmental assessment

Barry Coughlan, Matt Woolgar, Emma Jl Weisblatt, Robbie Duschinsky

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder are common behaviourally diagnosed conditions. One of the key aspects of diagnosis is clinical judgement. Yet despite decades of research, it is only in recent times that researchers have started exploring clinicians' perspectives on diagnosing these conditions. We aimed to add to this body of knowledge by conducting interviews with 17 experienced health care professionals in the United Kingdom to hear their perspectives on diagnosing autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Clinicians reflected that for some children and young people, diagnosis is reasonably straightforward; however, in other situations, decisions are made on more pragmatic grounds (i.e. will this be helpful). We identified some differences of opinion between professionals and organisation which adds to the complexity of applying a diagnosis. We recommend several areas for future research and point to some practical and philosophical implications of the work.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)13623613221121413
    JournalAutism : the international journal of research and practice
    DOIs
    Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 25 Sept 2022

    Keywords

    • decision-making
    • attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
    • diagnostic upgrading
    • qualitative
    • clinical reasoning
    • autism

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of ''Instruments are good at eliciting information; scores are very dangerous': The perspectives of clinical professionals regarding neurodevelopmental assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this