TY - JOUR
T1 - Interlocked
T2 - kinship, intimate precarity, and plantation labour in India
AU - Raj, Jayaseelan
N1 - Funding Information:
I dedicate this article to Andrew Lattas (University of Bergen) in appreciation of his mentoring and friendship. I thank Richard Axelby, Bhawani Buswala, and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. This article has also benefitted from the departmental seminar at LSE Anthropology and I thank all the participants.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Anthropological Institute.
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - This article examines the employment of kinship relations in sustaining the plantation economy and in perpetuating the precariousness of child labourers who later became temporary workers in the tea plantations of Kerala, South India. Kinship ties locked diverse workers into a moral obligation of care that could easily be manipulated by plantation management as a form of labour control. Plantation capitalism, therefore, sustained itself not only through overt forms of violence but also through manipulating the precarity of employment in relation to intimate forms of love, care, and obligation that were bound up with kinship ties. Kinship networks of different kinds need to be understood as integral to the plantation society and as occupying a fundamental place within the capitalist order of plantations. I observe that the entangled relationship between workers’ precarity and plantation capitalism can be understood only if we pay attention to what I call the intimate precarity produced by the employment of kinship networks within plantation capitalism.
AB - This article examines the employment of kinship relations in sustaining the plantation economy and in perpetuating the precariousness of child labourers who later became temporary workers in the tea plantations of Kerala, South India. Kinship ties locked diverse workers into a moral obligation of care that could easily be manipulated by plantation management as a form of labour control. Plantation capitalism, therefore, sustained itself not only through overt forms of violence but also through manipulating the precarity of employment in relation to intimate forms of love, care, and obligation that were bound up with kinship ties. Kinship networks of different kinds need to be understood as integral to the plantation society and as occupying a fundamental place within the capitalist order of plantations. I observe that the entangled relationship between workers’ precarity and plantation capitalism can be understood only if we pay attention to what I call the intimate precarity produced by the employment of kinship networks within plantation capitalism.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85168579828&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1467-9655.14041
DO - 10.1111/1467-9655.14041
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85168579828
SN - 1359-0987
VL - 29
SP - 880
EP - 898
JO - Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
JF - Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
IS - 4
ER -