International comparisons of survival from lung cancer: pitfalls and warnings

S C Erridge, H Moller, A Price, D Brewster

    Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature reviewpeer-review

    78 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Population-based survival data can provide valuable comparative data on outcome but should be interpreted with caution. Differences in data collection and analysis, patient and tumor characteristics and treatment options can have an impact on reported results. Ideally, data from the whole population, including clinical-only diagnoses, should be reported and the methods of case identification described. The relative survival rates should preferably be given. Data on patient characteristics such as age, sex, ethnicity and socioeconomic deprivation should be described, together with tumor details such as pathology and clinical stage. Whenever possible, details on the use of treatments should be reported
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)570 - 577
    Number of pages8
    JournalNATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ONCOLOGY
    Volume4
    Issue number10
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2007

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'International comparisons of survival from lung cancer: pitfalls and warnings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this