Abstract

The contribution of this paper is to question the World Bank’s estimates of global monetary poverty up to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We argue there is a political economy of overoptimism in the measurement of global poverty. Specifically, we show that the methodological and presentational choices made by the World Bank lead to a more optimistic view of the levels of, and trends in, global poverty. We provide an up-to-date critique of the global poverty estimates and demonstrate how patterns of poverty would differ if small changes in methodology were implemented. We conclude with a theoretical discussion of why the World Bank makes methodological choices that lead to an optimistic view of global poverty levels and trends. Subsequently, we propose an alternative approach to global poverty measurement.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-17
Number of pages17
JournalThird World Quarterly
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring Global Poverty Before and During the Pandemic. A Political Economy of Overoptimism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this