Abstract
What relation is there between knowledge and action? According to Hawthorne and Stanley, where your choice is p-dependent, it is appropriate to treat the proposition that p as a reason for acting iff you know that p (RKP). In this paper, I shall argue that it is permissible to treat something as a reason for action even if it isn't known to be true and address Hawthorne and Stanley's arguments for RKP.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY |
Volume | 106 |
Issue number | 8 |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2009 |