Neurometabolite differences in Autism as assessed with Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

1H-Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) is a non-invasive technique that can be used to quantify the concentrations of metabolites in the brain in vivo. MRS findings in the context of autism are inconsistent and conflicting. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of MRS studies measuring glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), as well as brain metabolites involved in energy metabolism (glutamine, creatine), neural and glial integrity (e.g. n-acetyl aspartate (NAA), choline, myo-inositol) and oxidative stress (glutathione) in autism cohorts. Data were extracted and grouped by metabolite, brain region and several other factors before calculation of standardised effect sizes. Overall, we find significantly lower concentrations of GABA and NAA in autism, indicative of disruptions to the balance between excitation/inhibition within brain circuits, as well as neural integrity. Further analysis found these alterations are most pronounced in autistic children and in limbic brain regions relevant to autism phenotypes. Additionally, we show how study outcome varies due to demographic and methodological factors , emphasising the importance of conforming with standardised consensus study designs and transparent reporting.

Original languageEnglish
Article number105728
Pages (from-to)105728
JournalNeuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
Volume162
Early online date25 May 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2024

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Autistic Disorder/metabolism
  • Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy/methods
  • Brain/metabolism
  • gamma-Aminobutyric Acid/metabolism
  • Glutamic Acid/metabolism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Neurometabolite differences in Autism as assessed with Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this