Abstract
An aspect of Peirce’s thought that might still be underappreciated is his resistance to what Levi calls pedigree epistemology, i.e., to the idea that a central focus in epistemology should be the justification of current beliefs. Somewhat more widely appreciated is his rejection of the subjective view of probabil-ity. We argue that Peirce’s criticisms of sub-jectivism, to the extent that they grant that such a conception of probability is viable at all, revert back to pedigree epistemology. A thoroughgoing rejection of pedigree in the context of probabilistic epistemology, how-ever, does challenge prominent subjectivist responses to the problem of the priors.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 138-166 |
Number of pages | 29 |
Journal | Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society |
Volume | 58 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2022 |
Keywords
- Bayesianism
- Belief-doubt Model
- Charles S. Peirce
- Common Prior
- Merging of Opinions
- Problem of the Priors
- Subjective Probability