Physicalism, consciousness and the antipathetic fallacy

David Papineau*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

In this paper I want to explain, from a physicalist point of view, why so many people are persuaded that consciousness is non-physical. I take there to be good arguments, stemming from the need to integrate conscious events into the causal workings of the world, for identifying conscious states with physical states, and in what follows I shall take these arguments as read. At the same time there is no doubt that many people have strong intuitions that consciousness cannot possibly be physical. My aim will be to explain how these intuitions arise, and why they do not discredit physicalism.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationConsciousness
PublisherTaylor and Francis Ltd.
Pages323-337
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)9781351949583
ISBN (Print)1855219522, 9781855219526
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Physicalism, consciousness and the antipathetic fallacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this