TY - JOUR
T1 - Pre-clinical non-viral vectors exploited for in vivo CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing
T2 - an overview
AU - Rouatbi, Nadia
AU - McGlynn, Tasneem
AU - Al-Jamal, Khuloud T.
N1 - Funding Information:
Authors would like to thank Dr Adam A Waters for proof reading the manuscript. Khuloud T. Al-Jamal acknowledges funding from the Brain Tumour Charity (GN-000398).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Royal Society of Chemistry
PY - 2022/5/23
Y1 - 2022/5/23
N2 - Clustered regulatory interspaced short palindromic repeats or CRISPR/Cas9 has emerged as a potent and versatile tool for efficient genome editing. This technology has been exploited for several applications including disease modelling, cell therapy, diagnosis, and treatment of many diseases including cancer. The in vivo application of CRISPR/Cas9 is hindered by poor stability, pharmacokinetic profile, and the limited ability of the CRISPR payloads to cross biological barriers. Although viral vectors have been implemented as delivery tools for efficient in vivo gene editing, their application is associated with high immunogenicity and toxicity, limiting their clinical translation. Hence, there is a need to explore new delivery methods that can guarantee safe and efficient delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 components to target cells. In this review, we first provide a brief history and principles of nuclease-mediated gene editing, we then focus on the different CRISPR/Cas9 formats outlining their potentials and limitations. Finally, we discuss the alternative non-viral delivery strategies currently adopted for in vivo CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing.
AB - Clustered regulatory interspaced short palindromic repeats or CRISPR/Cas9 has emerged as a potent and versatile tool for efficient genome editing. This technology has been exploited for several applications including disease modelling, cell therapy, diagnosis, and treatment of many diseases including cancer. The in vivo application of CRISPR/Cas9 is hindered by poor stability, pharmacokinetic profile, and the limited ability of the CRISPR payloads to cross biological barriers. Although viral vectors have been implemented as delivery tools for efficient in vivo gene editing, their application is associated with high immunogenicity and toxicity, limiting their clinical translation. Hence, there is a need to explore new delivery methods that can guarantee safe and efficient delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 components to target cells. In this review, we first provide a brief history and principles of nuclease-mediated gene editing, we then focus on the different CRISPR/Cas9 formats outlining their potentials and limitations. Finally, we discuss the alternative non-viral delivery strategies currently adopted for in vivo CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133102692&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1039/d1bm01452h
DO - 10.1039/d1bm01452h
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35604372
AN - SCOPUS:85133102692
SN - 2047-4830
VL - 10
SP - 3410
EP - 3432
JO - Biomaterials Science
JF - Biomaterials Science
IS - 13
ER -