Predictions of children's emotionality from evolutionary and epigenetic hypotheses

Jonathan Hill, Andrew Pickles, Nicola Wright, Elizabeth Braithwaite, Helen Sharp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)
125 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Sex-dependent effects of mismatched prenatal-postnatal maternal conditions are predicted by combining two evolutionary hypotheses: that foetal conditions provide a forecast of likely postnatal environments (Predictive Adaptive Response), and that the female foetus is better adapted than the male to maternal adversity (Trivers-Willard hypothesis). Animal studies have implicated glucocorticoid mechanisms modifiable by effects of postnatal tactile stimulation on glucocorticoid receptor gene expression. In this study we examined behavioural predictions in humans based on these evolutionary and epigenetic models. Mothers in a general population cohort provided self-reported anxiety scores at 20 weeks pregnancy, and at 9 weeks, 14 months and 3.5 years postpartum, and frequency of infant stroking at 9 weeks. Mothers and teachers reported child symptoms at 7 years. SEM models with maximum-likelihood estimates made use of data from 887 participants. There was a three-way interaction between prenatal and postnatal anxiety and maternal stroking in the prediction of irritability, seen only in girls. This arose because lower maternal stroking was associated with higher irritability, only in the mismatched, low-high and high-low maternal anxiety groups. We provide evidence that mechanisms likely to have evolved well before the emergence of humans, contribute to the development of children's emotionality and risk for depression.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2519
Pages (from-to)2519
JournalScientific Reports
Volume9
Issue number1
Early online date21 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 21 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predictions of children's emotionality from evolutionary and epigenetic hypotheses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this