Prevalence of symptoms in patients with multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature reviewpeer-review

112 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable haematological disease. Due to novel agents, overall survival has improved in this group, yet there are no systematic reviews to understand the symptom profiles resulting from disease and treatment-related toxicities. We aimed to synthesise data on the prevalence of symptoms in patients with MM.

Methods

A systematic database and grey literature search were conducted in six databases. Random-effects meta-analysis with inverse variance weighting to pool prevalence data was performed.

Results

Thirty-six studies were included of which 34 studies (N = 3023) provided data for meta-analysis. Twenty-seven distinct symptoms were reported, with the majority of studies focusing on pain (n = 27), fatigue (n = 19) and problems with functioning (n = 15). The most prevalent symptoms were fatigue (98.8%, 95% CI 98.1–99.2%), pain (73%, 39.9–91.7), constipation (65.2%, 22.9–92.2) and tingling in the hands/feet with 53.4% (0.4–99.7). The most common problems were decreased physical functioning (98.9%, 98.2–99.3), decreased cognitive functioning (80.2%, 40–96.1) and financial difficulties (78.4%, 39.1–95.4). These problems were present in newly diagnosed to advanced disease stage.

Conclusions

Optimal quality of life and good symptom management in this incurable disease can only be achieved by routinely assessing symptoms throughout the disease trajectory.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)416–429
Number of pages14
JournalEuropean journal of haematology
Volume97
Issue number5
Early online date6 Sept 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2016

Keywords

  • multiple myeloma, symptom burden, signs and symptoms, systematic review, prevalence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prevalence of symptoms in patients with multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this